Talk:Canadian military exercise NANOOK 2008 travels through uncharted waters

Comments

• Is this about Operation Nanook? Then the first paragraph should not speak of it in the future tense.
• Pick either Operation Nanook or Operation NANOOK, don't use both.
• I don't get the title, why center on one ship? Further it does not follow the naming guide. Please read WN:NC.
• Needs more cats.

--SVTCobra 09:32, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Review failed

Revision 684528 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 22:47, 26 August 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: What, Who, when and where is the article talking about? NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: Flow of article is off without the above Comments by reviewer: Has all the background, just needs the what happened, when and where, and why. --DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 22:47, 26 August 2008 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 684528 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 22:47, 26 August 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: What, Who, when and where is the article talking about? NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: Flow of article is off without the above Comments by reviewer: Has all the background, just needs the what happened, when and where, and why. --DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 22:47, 26 August 2008 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Second Review

Revision 684680 of this article has been reviewed by Gopher65 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 04:38, 27 August 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Better. Who, What, When, Where, How are now answered, and stylist problems have been fixed. Gopher65talk 04:38, 27 August 2008 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 684680 of this article has been reviewed by Gopher65 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 04:38, 27 August 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Better. Who, What, When, Where, How are now answered, and stylist problems have been fixed. Gopher65talk 04:38, 27 August 2008 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.