Change Your Image
Zooha-47207
My cinematic heart beats for classic Dutch series, 60s action movies,
Louis de Funès and much more! 🌍
I'm passionate about sharing my discoveries. 🍿
Ratings
Most Recently Rated
Lists
An error has ocurred. Please try againReviews
The Green Mile (1999)
A powerful, emotional journey, but emotionally overwhelming
The Green Mile is an incredible film that tells a deeply moving and emotional story, anchored by stellar performances from Tom Hanks and Michael Clarke Duncan.
The narrative explores heavy themes such as justice, redemption, and humanity, all set against the backdrop of a death row prison. It's one of those movies that leaves a lasting impact, with scenes that are both heartbreaking and profound. However, be warned-this movie is a tearjerker. It's nearly impossible to get through it without shedding a few tears, especially during its most emotional moments.
While the story is captivating, the film does feel a bit too long at times, which can make it a heavy watch. Despite this, it's a classic that resonates deeply, but you may want to brace yourself for the emotional rollercoaster.
Au Revoir, Chris Hemsworth (2020)
A complete misfire
This is a complete disaster from start to finish. There's really no redeeming quality here-whether it's the plot, acting, or direction. Chris Hemsworth has been part of some incredible films, but this is definitely not one of them. The storyline feels pointless and underdeveloped, and it's hard to believe this was even greenlit for release.
The pacing is off, the characters are uninteresting, and overall, it feels like a movie that was rushed into production with little thought given to quality. Avoid this one at all costs, as it's a waste of time and offers nothing of value to the audience...
Se7en (1995)
A dark, gripping masterpiece, but emotionally draining
Se7en is undeniably a well-crafted film with a deep, dark narrative that dives into the horrors of the human mind. The acting, especially from Morgan Freeman and Brad Pitt, is top-notch, and the story is intricately woven, leading to one of the most shocking and memorable endings in film history. However, while it's a brilliant piece of cinema, it's also extremely heavy.
The themes of sin, punishment, and morality weigh heavily on the viewer, making it a tough watch emotionally. It's not a film I would personally rewatch, simply because of how intense and disturbing the subject matter is. If you're looking for a dark, thought-provoking film with incredible storytelling, Se7en delivers, but be prepared for a movie that leaves you feeling somber.
Secret Window (2004)
Unpredictable and highly rewatchable
This psychological thriller starring Johnny Depp is nothing short of fantastic. Depp's portrayal of a troubled writer who finds himself entangled in a mysterious and increasingly dangerous plot is riveting. The story unfolds in such an unpredictable way that it keeps you on the edge of your seat the entire time. The twists and turns are masterfully executed, leaving you constantly guessing what will happen next.
It's one of those rare films that you can easily rewatch because of how well the suspense is built up, even when you know the outcome. The eerie atmosphere combined with Depp's superb acting makes this movie a standout in the psychological thriller genre. It's a must-watch for anyone who enjoys a clever, mind-bending story that sticks with you long after the credits roll.
Drishyam (2015)
Unrelatable for a Western audience
While this film has been highly praised in India, it doesn't resonate in the same way with Western viewers. The storyline revolves around a man trying to protect his family after a crime, which in itself could be interesting, but the cultural context and the pacing make it difficult for non-Indian audiences to engage fully with the plot.
The film's melodramatic tone and drawn-out scenes feel far too exaggerated for my taste, and the moral dilemmas presented don't hit with the same intensity they might for an audience more familiar with the setting. While it's always interesting to see films from different cultures, this one felt too alien and disconnected for me.
I couldn't relate to the characters or the societal issues portrayed, and after about 40 minutes, I found myself tuning out. The plot didn't offer enough intrigue to keep me invested, and it's a struggle to understand why this film is held in such high regard.
Ultimately, it's not a film I'd recommend unless you're deeply interested in Indian cinema or familiar with the cultural context.
Forrest Gump (1994)
Vastly overrated and overly sentimental
It's baffling how highly this film is regarded in popular culture. While the idea of a simple man unintentionally impacting major historical events is unique, the film's execution leaves much to be desired. The over-reliance on nostalgia and sentimentalism feels forced, and the story drags for far too long without offering much substance beyond a collection of random life events.
The character of Forrest himself, while intended to be heartwarming, comes off as bland and one-dimensional, with no real personal growth throughout the film. Tom Hanks does a fine job portraying the role, but even his performance can't save the movie from its monotonous pacing.
The mix of drama, comedy, and historical references feels clunky, and at times, it's hard to take the film seriously. Despite its critical acclaim and massive box office success, I found it difficult to get through and completely perplexing as to why this film has achieved such legendary status. For me, it was a chore to watch, and I have no intention of sitting through it again.
T2 3-D: Battle Across Time (1996)
A decent theme park experience, but limited
This short 3D film from Universal Studios was created as an immersive attraction, and in that sense, it does its job well. The blend of live-action performances and 3D effects brings a level of excitement and engagement that's typical of theme park attractions. As a continuation of the Terminator franchise, it offers a fun, action-packed storyline that feels like a bonus feature for fans of the movies.
However, it's important to remember that this is not a full-fledged film, and its limited run time and theme park format mean that it lacks the depth or complexity of the main Terminator films. While it would have been thrilling to experience it live, the fact that it was restricted to certain Universal Studios locations means that most people, especially in Europe, missed out on it.
Watching it now, the experience doesn't quite translate the same way. It's fun, but ultimately not a must-see unless you're a die-hard Terminator fan. The practical effects are impressive, but you can't help but feel like it's just a glorified ride with a predictable storyline.
Un chien andalou (1929)
Disturbing and unpleasant to watch
This 1929 surrealist short film is often heralded as groundbreaking, but I personally found it disturbing and unnecessarily grotesque. The famous scene of an eyeball being sliced open is one of the most graphic and unsettling things I've seen in cinema, and it completely overshadows any artistic merit the film might have.
It's a hard watch, and while it may have been revolutionary in its time, the lack of plot or coherent narrative makes it feel more like a collection of shocking and disconnected images.
There's an argument to be made about its artistic significance and its role in influencing avant-garde cinema, but I can't help but feel that its notoriety comes more from its shock factor than from any true artistic depth. The film's reputation as a classic feels undeserved, especially considering how uncomfortable it is to sit through. For a modern audience, it's difficult to see the value in such imagery, and I'm still confused as to how this ever made it into the IMDb top 250.
Playboy: The Best of Pamela Anderson (1995)
More soft porn than documentary
This film is a major disappointment, especially if you're expecting anything close to a real documentary or meaningful reflection on Pamela Anderson's career or life.
Instead, what you get is essentially a compilation of soft porn scenes, which offers almost no substance or storytelling. While Pamela Anderson was an icon of the 90s, this film doesn't do justice to her impact on pop culture.
It's merely a superficial showcase that feels entirely outdated in today's context. There's no real narrative, no exploration of her career highs and lows, and certainly no insight into her personal struggles or achievements.
What could have been an interesting look into one of the most recognized figures of a generation ends up being a shallow visual display that serves little purpose other than appealing to a very specific audience.
Inside Job (2010)
An insightful documentary about corruption of banks and governments
Inside Job provides a good overview of the financial crisis and the corruption that led to it, painting a clear picture of how those in power manipulated the system to their benefit.
It's a solid documentary that exposes the unethical practices of big financial institutions and the government, showcasing how the middle class and lower-income individuals were left to deal with the consequences while the rich grew richer.
While I appreciated the depth of research and the interviews, the documentary didn't quite offer anything new to someone already familiar with the events of the 2008 crisis. It's a good watch for those wanting a crash course on the topic, but for me, it didn't have the impact I hoped it would.
The message, while important, felt somewhat repetitive, and it left me feeling frustrated at the lack of real accountability for the people responsible.
12th Fail (2023)
Fails to capture interest
12th Fail is a film that's hard to get into, especially for Western audiences. The movie highlights the struggles and challenges faced in India's educational and societal systems, but the execution leaves much to be desired.
The pacing is slow, the storytelling feels disjointed, and overall it lacks the kind of engagement that keeps you invested. I only made it about 20 minutes in before deciding to turn it off, as it just wasn't holding my attention.
The film could have offered an interesting perspective on India's society, but the dull approach and lack of engaging storytelling made it too difficult to sit through. It's a movie that might appeal more to those familiar with the cultural context, but as an outsider, I found it uninteresting and slow.
How to Train Your Dragon 2 (2014)
Not my kind of film
I've never been drawn to animated fantasy films, and How to Train Your Dragon didn't change my mind. It's clearly aimed at a younger audience, with its colorful world of dragons and adventure, but I couldn't connect with the characters or the story.
The plot feels predictable, and while the animation itself is impressive, it's not enough to make up for the lack of emotional depth.
I found the storyline unengaging, and the humor didn't land for me. This is likely a film that works well for kids or fans of animated adventures, but it's definitely not my type of entertainment. Watching it felt like a chore, and I couldn't wait for it to end.
Whiplash (2014)
Intense but ultimately one-note
Whiplash sets out to explore ambition, obsession, and the pursuit of perfection, but it doesn't quite hit all the right notes for me. The story centers on a relentless music instructor, Fletcher, whose abusive methods push his students to the brink, and his relationship with a young drummer, Andrew.
While the initial setup is captivating, the film quickly becomes repetitive and almost sadistic in its portrayal of Fletcher's teaching style. The dynamic between the two leads feels like it's stuck in a single gear - brutality.
While the performances, especially J. K. Simmons', are undeniably powerful, the lack of emotional depth in the storyline makes it less compelling. There's little exploration of why Fletcher is the way he is, or why Andrew puts up with it.
The result is a film that, despite its intensity, feels shallow and ultimately underwhelming. It's hard to stay invested when the story becomes more about cruelty than growth or understanding.
The Martian (2015)
Engaging but not my genre
Although The Martian is firmly rooted in the sci-fi genre, which isn't my usual preference, I was pleasantly surprised by how engaging the film turned out to be.
Matt Damon gives a strong performance as Mark Watney, and the movie's focus on his survival on Mars offers a compelling blend of science and human emotion.
The script successfully balances moments of tension with humor, making the dire situation more digestible. However, despite the film's quality, the sci-fi elements, like space travel and the heavy use of scientific jargon, didn't fully resonate with me.
For fans of the genre, this will likely be a much more enjoyable experience, but for me, it was a one-time watch. Still, I appreciated the journey and the production quality, just not enough to watch it again.
Ford v Ferrari (2019)
An exhilarating ride with outstanding performances
Ford v ferrari is an exceptionally well-crafted film that captures the intensity and passion of the high-stakes world of car racing. Christian Bale delivers a standout performance, fully immersing you in the emotional journey of his character, Ken Miles.
You genuinely feel his frustrations, his ambitions, and his sheer determination to see Ford triumph against the odds. The film does a fantastic job of building tension, with gripping race sequences that keep you on the edge of your seat. It manages to convey the technical details of racing while also telling a deeply human story of rivalry, innovation, and the drive for success.
The ending was unexpected and packed an emotional punch, leaving a lasting impact. Overall, I highly recommend it to anyone, whether you're a car enthusiast or just looking for a great story about perseverance and passion. It's a thrilling watch that hits all the right notes.
The Godfather Trilogy: 1901-1980 (1992)
A classic saga that feels overly drawn out
While the godfather trilogy is considered a cinematic masterpiece, it didn't quite live up to the hype for me. The story is undeniably epic, with strong performances and iconic moments, but the films are incredibly long and often feel drawn out. The pacing can be painfully slow at times, with scenes that linger longer than necessary and a plot that becomes overly complicated and repetitive.
Watching all three films can feel like a real endurance test, and it's easy to lose interest in the lengthy, meandering narrative. Despite its reputation, the trilogy can feel more like a lesson in patience than an entertaining experience.
It has its moments, but the excessive runtime and slow progression make it less enjoyable than I expected. For me, it was just okay, but not the gripping saga it's often made out to be.
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire (2013)
A captivating sequel that raises the stakes
Cathing fire is a strong follow-up to the original hunger games film, building on its strengths and delivering a more intense and engaging experience.
The story delves deeper into the dystopian world of Panem, with higher stakes and more complex character dynamics.
The arena scenes are thrilling and visually impressive, and the plot twists keep the audience on their toes. Watching it in the cinema was an immersive experience; the tension was palpable, and you felt genuinely invested in the characters' fates.
The performances are compelling, particularly Jennifer Lawrence, who brings depth and nuance to Katniss. Overall, it's a great sequel that successfully balances action, drama, and political intrigue, making it a standout entry in the franchise.
The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 (2014)
A decent finale that struggles to maintain the momentum
The hunger games: mockingjay attempts to wrap up the dystopian saga, but it doesn't quite match the intensity and excitement of the first two films. The decision to split the final book into two movies seems to have affected the pacing, making parts of the story feel stretched out and less engaging. While there are still some suspenseful moments and emotional beats, the film lacks the action and intrigue that made the hunger games and catching fire so compelling. The darker tone and focus on political maneuvering might appeal to some fans, but it often feels like it's dragging. It's a decent film for those invested in the series, but it doesn't have the same energy or thrill as its predecessors, making it a somewhat lackluster conclusion.
De oranjewinter (2022)
simple humor with limited appeal
De oranjewinter is a show that tries to blend sports commentary with humor, but it often falls flat. The humor is very basic, often relying on simple jokes that don't really hit the mark for viewers looking for something more substantial. The discussions lack depth, and the overall content feels rather uninspired. Johan does manage to inject some life into the show with his charisma and wit, but he is really the only redeeming factor. Without him, the show would be almost unbearable. It's a program that might work as casual background noise, but it's certainly not something to actively look forward to. If you're after more engaging sports talk or comedy, there are better options out there.
Vandaag Inside (2022)
Weak form of what voetbal international and voetbal inside once were
Vandaag inside often feels like a show made for people who enjoy surface-level discussions and basic humor. The conversations are rarely insightful or intellectually stimulating, often revolving around trivial topics or sensationalized news. The hosts tend to lean on simplistic jokes and repetitive banter, which quickly becomes tiresome. It lacks the depth and nuance needed to make it more than just simple entertainment. If you're looking for intelligent discourse or meaningful analysis, you won't find it here. It's the kind of TV that's more about easy laughs and light-hearted chatter than any real substance.
We Zijn Er Bijna (2011)
Dull and lacking substance
We zijn er bijna is a show that doesn't offer much beyond its simplistic charm of following Dutch retirees as they travel with their caravans. While it might appeal to those who enjoy a slow-paced, almost mundane look at vacation life, it lacks any real excitement or compelling content. The pace is extremely slow, and the focus on day-to-day travel details can become quite tedious. The show doesn't offer any deep insights or captivating stories, making it hard to stay engaged. It feels like it's designed for viewers who don't mind watching something light and uneventful, but for anyone looking for real entertainment, this one misses the mark.
RTL Boulevard (2001)
Shallow content for a simplistic audience
Rtl boulevard is a show that seems to cater to the lowest common denominator, focusing on gossip, celebrity news, and superficial entertainment. The content is light, fluffy, and often feels like it's designed for people who aren't looking for anything substantial or thought-provoking. The discussions lack depth, and the hosts rarely offer any real insight or meaningful commentary. Instead, it's just a parade of trivial stories and sensational headlines that don't offer much value. For anyone seeking intelligent or engaging television, rtl boulevard falls flat. It's an easy pass unless you enjoy simplistic entertainment.
In Bruges (2008)
Weird and not as funny as expected
In bruges is often praised as a dark comedy, but it didn't hit the mark for me. The humor feels strange and misses the target, coming off as more awkward than genuinely funny. The story follows two hitmen hiding out in Bruges, Belgium, but the dialogue, while sharp for some, feels overly quirky and forced to me. The plot meanders without a clear direction, and while there are a few interesting moments, they're overshadowed by the film's odd tone and pacing. The setting in Bruges is visually appealing, but it's not enough to save the movie from its lack of genuine comedy or emotional depth. Overall, it just didn't work for me and felt more confusing than entertaining.
Eva (2024)
Overly Biased and Unbalanced, Disappointingly Scores 1/10
The Eva series, a Dutch talk show, unfortunately earns a low rating of 1/10 from me, mainly due to its perceived bias and lack of balanced perspectives. The show seems to lean heavily towards a particular political viewpoint, presenting content that feels more like propaganda than objective journalism.
One of the key issues with Jinek is its apparent inclination towards extreme left-wing and 'woke' ideologies. This singular focus results in a show that lacks the diversity of thought and opinion necessary for a well-rounded discussion. The absence of varied perspectives and debates on critical issues diminishes the program's credibility and appeal, especially for viewers seeking unbiased and comprehensive coverage.
Moreover, the show's approach to handling different topics comes across as one-sided, often neglecting to provide a platform for opposing viewpoints. This lack of balance makes it challenging for viewers who value impartiality and open dialogue in news and talk shows.
In conclusion, while talk shows play a crucial role in public discourse, the Jinek series misses the mark by not offering a fair and balanced platform for discussion. Its perceived bias and lack of diverse perspectives lead to a low rating, as it fails to meet the standards of objective and inclusive journalism.
EénVandaag (1993)
Boring, biased, and full of propaganda
Eenvandaag has become nearly unwatchable. It feels more like a tedious lecture than an engaging current affairs program.
The topics are often presented with a strong left-wing bias, and the reporting lacks balance or nuance. Instead of providing a fair, in-depth exploration of issues, it often comes across as pushing a specific political agenda, aligning closely with government views.
The discussions lack diversity of thought and seem aimed at reinforcing a singular perspective rather than encouraging a well-rounded debate. Overall, it feels more like propaganda than journalism, making it a very dull and frustrating watch.