[Circadian rhythms variability of arterial pressure: methodological aspects for the measurement]

Med Clin (Barc). 1999 Mar 6;112(8):285-9.
[Article in Spanish]

Abstract

Background: To study the differences among the methods used for estimating daytime and nighttime ambulatory blood pressure values, and to analyze their determinant factors.

Subjects and methods: In 402 individuals mean values of systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) during 24 h, daytime and nighttime, were calculated by three different methods: a) real-time, following a minidiary; b) long-time, having a nighttime period from 23:00 to 07:00 h, and a daytime one from 08:00 to 22:00 h, and c) short-time, having a nighttime period from midnight to 6:00 h, and a daytime one from 08:00 to 22:00 h.

Results: Daytime mean values of SBP and DBP were similar for the three methods. Nighttime mean values of SBP and DBP calculated using the long-time were significantly higher than those calculated with the real-time ((SBP -2.25 [5.3] mmHg, p < 0.05; DBP -1.17 [3.4] mmHg, p < 0.05). No differences were observed for both SBP and DBP with the real-time. The number of sleeping hours was the main determinant of the differences observed between the long-time and the real-time methods. The percentage of subjects with a non-dipping pattern were 17, 26 and 18% for real, long and short time methods, respectively.

Conclusions: Daytime mean BP values are reproducible whatever the method used, but for estimating nighttime mean BP values short-time is the best of the fixed-time methods. Minidiary should be used if more accurate values are necessary or if the subjects sleep habits do not fit into the standard patterns.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Blood Pressure / physiology*
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Circadian Rhythm / physiology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hypertension / diagnosis*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged