Effects of long-acting versus short-acting calcium channel blockers among older survivors of acute myocardial infarction

J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999 May;47(5):512-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb02562.x.

Abstract

Objective: Recent studies have highlighted the potentially harmful effects of short-acting calcium channel blockers, especially of the dihydropyridine type, in patients with coronary heart disease. Some have argued that long-acting calcium channel blockers are safer, but few outcome data exist. The objective of the study was to compare the occurrence of adverse outcomes among recipients of long-acting versus short-acting calcium channel blockers, with dihydropyridines and non-dihydropyridines compared separately.

Setting: The New Jersey Medicare population.

Design: A retrospective cohort study using linked Medicare and drug claims data.

Participants: Older survivors of acute myocardial infarction (MI) occurring in 1989 and 1990. Eligible subjects had survived at least 30 days after the MI, participated in Medicare and a drug benefits program, and were prescribed a single type of either a long-acting or a short-acting calcium channel blocker within 90 days after the MI.

Measurements: The two outcome measures were rates of all-cause mortality and cardiac rehospitalization. Using separate Cox regression models for dihydropyridines (nifedipine, nicardipine) and non-dihydropyridines (diltiazem, verapamil), we examined these outcomes for recipients of long-acting compared with short-acting calcium channel blockers.

Results: Of the 833 patients eligible for the study, 160 were prescribed long-acting and 673 short-acting calcium channel blockers. Clinical characteristics of long-acting and short-acting users were comparable. During 2 years of follow-up, 221 deaths and 300 rehospitalizations occurred. Controlling for age, sex, race, and indicators of disease severity and comorbidity, the relative risk of dying for recipients of long-acting, compared with short-acting, dihydropyridines was .42 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.21-0.86). For cardiac rehospitalization, the relative risk was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.34-0.94). For the long-acting versus short-acting nondihydropyridines, the adjusted relative risk of dying was 1.43 (95% CI, 0.88-2.32), and for cardiac rehospitalization, .65 (95% CI, 0.40-1.05).

Conclusion: Use of long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers after acute MI was associated with substantially lower rates of cardiac rehospitalization and death compared with use of their short-acting counterparts. More data are needed to address the possibility that long-acting, compared with short-acting, non-dihydropyridines could decrease rehospitalization rates but increase mortality.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Calcium Channel Blockers / adverse effects*
  • Calcium Channel Blockers / therapeutic use
  • Dihydropyridines / adverse effects*
  • Dihydropyridines / therapeutic use
  • Diltiazem / adverse effects
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Myocardial Infarction / prevention & control*
  • Nicardipine / adverse effects
  • Nifedipine / adverse effects
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk
  • Survival Analysis
  • Survivors
  • Verapamil / adverse effects

Substances

  • Calcium Channel Blockers
  • Dihydropyridines
  • 1,4-dihydropyridine
  • Verapamil
  • Nicardipine
  • Diltiazem
  • Nifedipine