Can we prescribe hormone replacement therapy (HRT) safely for women, with postmenopausal complaints who were treated for a gynaecological malignancy? Only three retrospective studies have investigated this issue in endometrial cancer patients. No recurrences or deaths occurred in these treated groups. However, the physician introduced bias through the selection of favourable groups. At present, combined estrogen and progestogen therapy is probably not contra-indicated in endometrial cancer stage I and probably also not in stage II, although so far there is only circumstantial evidence. Squamous cell cancers of the cervix, vulva, and vagina are unlikely to be influenced by HRT. In the only study available of women with ovarian cancer, < or = 50 years, estrogen replacement therapy did not have a negative influence on (disease-free) survival. According to the data currently available, no evidence exists that HRT adversely influences survival and overall survival after treatment for ovarian cancer. In general, adenocarcinomas of the cervix and leiomyosarcomas of the uterus may be managed such as the adenocarcinomas of the uterus. During the last 25 years, HRT has been shown to substantially reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases, osteoporotic fractures and colon carcinoma. On the other hand there is a significant increase of the risk in breast cancer with prolonged use of > 5 years. Re-evaluation of the current view that HRT should no be given to women treated for a gynaecological malignancy is strongly warranted after evaluating the advantages and the disadvantages of HRT use in each individual patient. Long-term HRT in women treated for a gynaecological cancer must be based on the medical history of the individual patient (and her family).