Outcome in refractory depression

J Affect Disord. 1999 Aug;54(3):287-94. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(98)00201-8.

Abstract

Background: Failure to respond to first-line antidepressant treatment can occur in up to 40% of patients with depressive illness. A proven strategy for managing this refractory depression is lithium augmentation. The long-term outcome and optimal management of patients treated with lithium augmentation remains unclear. We describe a 4-8 year naturalistic follow-up of patients treated with lithium augmentation in two controlled studies of its efficacy in refractory depression.

Method: Cases were followed up with personal interview where possible, and by telephone and general practitioner contact otherwise. Lifetime clinical status was ascertained using the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Lifetime (SADS-L).

Results: We obtained outcome data on 53 of the original eligible 76 patients. There was a good outcome in 38 (72%) patients. Good outcome was associated with a less endogenous nature of depression and an absence of previous hospitalisations.

Conclusions: There do not seem to be any specific prognostic indicators of long-term outcome to lithium augmentation beyond those recognised to be relevant in the outcome of depression generally.

Limitations: The conclusions are limited by incomplete follow-up of the total original sample and lack of objective illness and medication data for the intervening period.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Depressive Disorder / drug therapy*
  • Depressive Disorder / physiopathology
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Lithium / therapeutic use*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prognosis
  • Recurrence
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Lithium