Outcome of different types of long-term antidepressant treatments: a 3-year follow-up study of 14182 patients

J Affect Disord. 1999 Sep;55(1):67-71. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(99)00002-6.

Abstract

Background: Antidepressant efficacy studies are rare in large populations for prolonged periods.

Methods: The efficacy of antidepressants was investigated by using disability pensions due to major affective disorders as the efficacy variable from a large Finnish population (n = 14182) during a 3-year follow-up.

Results: Of all males, 345 (6.0%) were receiving disability pension due to major affective disorder, and of all females, 498 (5.9%). A logistic regression analysis showed a significantly higher risk (age-adjusted ORs, 1.42-4.09) for disability pension in every antidepressant group except the amitriptyline group when compared with fluoxetine group. Those who used a combination of antidepressive agents (age-adjusted OR 4.09) or moclobemide (age-adjusted OR 2.18) had the highest risks.

Conclusions: In the study population fluoxetine and amitriptyline were the most efficient antidepressants in the long-term treatment of depression.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Amitriptyline / administration & dosage
  • Amitriptyline / adverse effects
  • Antidepressive Agents / administration & dosage*
  • Antidepressive Agents / adverse effects
  • Depressive Disorder / diagnosis
  • Depressive Disorder / drug therapy*
  • Depressive Disorder / psychology
  • Female
  • Fluoxetine / administration & dosage
  • Fluoxetine / adverse effects
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Long-Term Care
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Antidepressive Agents
  • Fluoxetine
  • Amitriptyline