Comparison between a 2- and 3-grade system in predicting metastatic-free survival in extremity soft-tissue sarcoma

J Surg Oncol. 1999 Oct;72(2):77-82. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9098(199910)72:2<77::aid-jso7>3.0.co;2-4.

Abstract

Background and objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a histologic grading system consisting of 2 or 3 categories had better discrimination for predicting metastasis-free survival in extremity soft-tissue sarcoma.

Methods: One hundred thirty patients with nonmetastatic soft-tissue sarcoma were identified and the histologic grade (3-grade system) for each tumor was determined. For the 2-grade system, grade was determined by collapsing 3 grades into 2. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate disease free survival.

Results: By use of a 3-grade system, grade 2 tumors showed a 5.2-fold and grade 3 tumors a 9-fold increased risk of systemic relapse when compared with grade 1 tumors. When grade 2 and 3 tumors were combined, they had a 2.6-fold increased risk of systemic relapse compared with grade 1 tumors. When grade 1 and 2 tumors were combined, grade 3 tumors had an 8.4-fold risk of relapse. After data were controlled for size and depth of tumor, each increase in grade in the 3-grade system showed a successive 2.3-fold increase in risk of systemic relapse.

Conclusions: A 3-grade system may be more appropriate for predicting systemic relapse than 2 grades. A prospective study is required to confirm this.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Extremities
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Staging / methods*
  • Recurrence
  • Risk
  • Sarcoma / pathology*
  • Soft Tissue Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Survival Analysis