A comparison of electrophysiological tests for the early diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy

Muscle Nerve. 1999 Dec;22(12):1667-73. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(199912)22:12<1667::aid-mus8>3.0.co;2-w.

Abstract

Clinical criteria and several electrophysiological parameters for detecting nerve damage were compared in 99 patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 and type 2. Abnormal results were found in sural/radial amplitude ratio (51%), minimal F-wave latency of the tibial nerve (36.4%), sensory conduction velocity of the sural nerve (29.8%), and sural sensory nerve action potential amplitude (29.3%) when pooling data from all patients and comparing them to age- and height-matched normal control subjects. Analysis of all the parameters revealed large differences between the diabetes mellitus type 1 and type 2 groups, suggesting that the type of diabetes must be taken into account when comparing the sensitivity of nerve conduction tests. In diabetes mellitus type 1, the sural/radial ratio had the clearest correlation with course of illness and was the first parameter to show a significant reduction. We conclude that the simple ratio between sural and radial amplitudes is a very sensitive parameter and abnormalities in this ratio provide the means for earliest detection of neuropathy in diabetes mellitus type 1.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Action Potentials / physiology
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Child
  • Diabetic Neuropathies / diagnosis*
  • Diabetic Neuropathies / physiopathology
  • Electrodiagnosis*
  • Electrophysiology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Motor Neurons / physiology
  • Neural Conduction / physiology
  • Neurons, Afferent / physiology
  • Radial Nerve / physiopathology
  • Sural Nerve / physiopathology
  • Tibial Nerve / physiopathology