The midgait protocol is the most commonly used method to collect pressure platform data. Spatial limitations, however, frequently render this technique unsuitable. Alternative gait protocols have focused on gait initiation procedures in obtaining data. The current study investigated whether a commonly cited two-step gait initiation protocol, or a two-step gait termination protocol produced pressure data more representative of the criterion, midgait method. A pressure platform was used to collect data for 25 asymptomatic subjects using the midgait, two-step gait initiation and two-step gait termination walking protocols. The contact duration, percentage contact duration, peak pressure, peak force, pressure-time integral and force-time integral were calculated for seven sites within the foot. Multivariate analysis of variance with repeated measures identified significant protocol by site interactions for all variables except the force-time integral. The gait initiation protocol, although having minimal effect on peak pressures beneath the forefoot, markedly altered the relative timing parameters of the foot. In contrast, the gait termination protocol had minimal effect on temporal parameters, but resulted in a reduction in pressures beneath the forefoot. Abbreviated gait protocols are often employed in plantar pressure studies. This study suggests that the choice between a gait initiation and termination protocol is largely dependent on the gait parameter of interest.