What is the price of perfection? The hidden costs of using detailed assessment instruments to measure alcohol consumption

J Stud Alcohol. 1999 Nov;60(6):756-8. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1999.60.756.

Abstract

Objective: This article describes results from a study investigating the effects of using long assessment instruments on attrition rates in mailed-out surveys.

Method: Participants were randomly assigned to receive one of two versions of a mailed-out survey; one version incorporated a detailed assessment of drinking using the Timeline Follow back method (TLFB; n = 46) and the other employed a brief graduated frequency measure of alcohol consumption (n = 49).

Results: 29% fewer respondents who received the TLFB returned any of their survey materials as compared to those respondents who received just the graduated frequency measure (22% vs 51%).

Conclusions: In some situations, e.g., mailed-out surveys, employing detailed survey instruments may not be justified as the increased respondent burden may result in increased attrition rates.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Alcohol Drinking / epidemiology*
  • Data Collection / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans