The role of intraoperative gram stain in the diagnosis of infection during revision total hip arthroplasty

J Arthroplasty. 1999 Dec;14(8):952-6. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(99)90009-8.

Abstract

A total of 202 revision hip arthroplasties in 178 patients, over a 2-year period, were evaluated prospectively. Intraoperative Gram stains were obtained from periprosthetic tissues in all cases. Of these, a definitive diagnosis of infection, using defined criteria, was established in 35 cases. Of these 35 patients, 17 had received antibiotics before surgery. The intraoperative cultures were positive in 8 of the 17 patients who had received antibiotics and 17 of the 18 patients who had not received preoperative antibiotics. In 1 infected case, intraoperative cultures of periprosthetic tissues failed to reveal bacterial growth, despite the fact that the patient received no preoperative antibiotics. Overall, there were 5 true-positive Gram stain results, 172 true-negative results, 3 false-positive results, and 22 false-negative results. The sensitivity of the Gram stain was 19%, specificity was 98%, predictive value of a positive test was 63%, and predictive value of a negative test was 89%. These results suggest that the intraoperative Gram stain is not a sensitive tool for the diagnosis of infection and should not be used when attempting to diagnose infection intraoperatively.

MeSH terms

  • Antibiotic Prophylaxis
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / methods
  • Bacterial Infections / diagnosis*
  • Hip Prosthesis / adverse effects*
  • Humans
  • Intraoperative Care
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Prospective Studies
  • Prosthesis-Related Infections / diagnosis*
  • Reoperation
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Staining and Labeling