The value of a mortality-scoring system in the quality control of patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1999 Dec;18(6):523-6. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.1999.0942.

Abstract

Objectives: to assess the quality of care of patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery.

Materials: three hundred and forty-six patients undergoing surgery for aneurysmal or occlusive disease of whom 51 died.

Methods: we developed a mortality registration system to classify causes of death, to evaluate shortcomings in treatment, and to determine the extent of agreement between clinical diagnosis and necropsy findings.

Results: the main cause of death for 11 patients (22%) was a poor clinical condition at admission, while 76% (n=39) of the patients died due to postoperative complications. Myocardial infarction was the most frequently encountered complication. Deficiencies in medical treatment were observed in 10 of the 51 deaths (20%). Autopsy was performed in 33 of the 51 patients (65%), revealing in 10 cases (30%) a major discrepancy between pre- and postmortem findings. Six of the 10 autopsies revealed that a myocardial infarction had been missed during the postoperative period.

Conclusions: autopsy reports are essential for accurately estimating complication rates as we observed discrepancies in 30% of cases.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Aorta, Abdominal* / surgery
  • Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / diagnosis
  • Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / mortality*
  • Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / surgery
  • Arterial Occlusive Diseases / diagnosis
  • Arterial Occlusive Diseases / mortality*
  • Arterial Occlusive Diseases / surgery
  • Cause of Death
  • Female
  • Hospital Mortality
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Medical Audit / methods*
  • Postoperative Complications / diagnosis
  • Postoperative Complications / mortality*
  • Quality Control
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Survival Rate
  • Vascular Surgical Procedures / standards*