Sialyl Le(x), NeuNAcalpha2 --> 3Galbeta1 --> 4(Fucalpha1 --> 3)GlcNAcbeta --> R, is known to be a ligand for E-selectin in various assays. The sulfated counterpart of sialyl Le(x), sulfo Le(x), (Sulfo --> 3) Galbeta1 --> 4 (Fucalpha1 --> 3) GlcNAcbeta --> R, was also shown to be a ligand for E-selectin in solid-phase assays employing immobilized oligosaccharides. In order to determine whether sulfo Le(x) structure on the cell surface also works as E-selectin or P-selectin ligand, a novel approach for in vitro transfer of oligosaccharides (S. Tsuboi, Y. Isogai, N. Hada, J. K. King, O. Hindsgaul, and M. Fukuda (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 27213-27216) was utilized. A synthetic GDP-fucose harboring sialyl Le(x) or sulfo Le(x) oligosaccharide was enzymatically transferred to Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells with a milk fucosyltransferase. The resultant cells, CHO-sialyl Le(x) and CHO-sulfo Le(x) were tested for adhesion to E-selectin. IgG or P-selectin. IgG chimeric protein coated on plates. The results indicate that CHO-sialyl Le(x) adhered efficiently to E-selectin, while adhesion of CHO-sulfo Le(x) was very poor despite the fact that near equal number of the ligands had been attached to the cell surface. In contrast, CHO-sulfo Le(x) adhered efficiently to P-selectin, while CHO-sialyl Le(x) adhered modestly to P-selectin. These results demonstrate that sialyl Le(x) and sulfo Le(x) structures on the cell surface differ substantially in their ability to adhere to E- and P-selectin.
Copyright 2000 Academic Press.