Purpose: To determine the role of surgery and adjuvant interleukin (IL)-2-based immunotherapy in the treatment of patients with advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma
Patients and methods: The survival of 354 consecutive patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with IL-2-based immunotherapy through the UCLA Medical Center Kidney Cancer Program was analyzed There were five groups of patients. Patients who initially presented with metastatic disease received either (1) IL-2 therapy with primary tumor in place; (2) nephrectomy followed by IL-2 therapy, or (3) nephrectomy followed by immunotherapy with IL-2 plus tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Patients who underwent nephrectomy for localized disease were divided into two groups: (4) those who developed metastatic disease > or = 6 months after nephrectomy and then received IL-2 therapy; and (5) those who developed metastatic disease < 6 months after nephrectomy and then received IL-2 therapy. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated for all patient groups.
Results: Among patients who received IL-2-based immunotherapy with their primary tumor in place (group 1; n = 36), 1- and 2-year survival rates were 29% and 4%, respectively, compared with 1- and 2-year survival rates of 67% and 44%, respectively, for all similar patients who underwent nephrectomy prior to IL-2 therapy (n = 235). Among patients initially presenting with metastatic disease who underwent nephrectomy followed by IL-2 therapy without tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (group 2; n = 69), the 1- and 2-year survival rates were 53% and 25%, respectively. The best survival was observed in patients treated with nephrectomy followed by IL-2 plus tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy (group 3; n = 102), which yielded 1- and 2-year survival rates of 73% and 55%, respectively. Among patients initially undergoing nephrectomy for localized disease, patients receiving IL-2-based therapy for subsequent metastasis > or = 6 months following nephrectomy (group 4; n = 128) had 1- and 2-year survival rates of 64% and 40%, respectively, compared with 45% and 15%, respectively, for patients developing metastasis < 6 months after nephrectomy (group 5; n = 19).
Conclusion: The role of surgery prior to IL-2-based immunotherapy remains controversial Our data demonstrate that aggressive surgery is safe, causing minimal morbidity despite extensive tumor involvement, and significantly improves survival outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma when carried out in conjunction with an IL2-based immunotherapy regimen.