Use of a peripherally implanted subcutaneous permanent central venous access device for chemotherapy--the Singapore General Hospital experience

Aust N Z J Med. 2000 Aug;30(4):470-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2000.tb02054.x.

Abstract

Background: Venous access for chemotherapy patients at the Singapore General Hospital has conventionally been via an externalised (Hickman) catheter. A peripherally implanted permanent subcutaneous central venous access device (P.A.S.Port) was introduced in 1996.

Aims: We review its use, complications and cost competitiveness with other chemotherapy delivery systems.

Methods: A retrospective study of clinical records was conducted with follow up interviews of patients and nursing staff.

Results: Twelve patients had the P.A.S.Port inserted for administration of chemotherapy as an outpatient procedure. Immediate complications were pain (8%) and bruising (8%). One port-related infection (8%) one week following insertion was reported and one patient complained of interference with elbow movement as a late complication. Cost analysis was favourable for P.A.S.Port over an externalised Hickman catheter or chest-placed port at one year. Patient and nursing staff acceptance was high.

Conclusion: P.A.S.Port insertion is a safe outpatient procedure and is an alternative for permanent venous access.

MeSH terms

  • Catheterization, Central Venous* / economics*
  • Catheters, Indwelling*
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Hospitals, General
  • Humans
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Singapore