Comparison between a nucleic acid sequence-based amplification and branched DNA test for quantifying HIV RNA load in blood plasma

J Virol Methods. 2000 Sep;89(1-2):177-81. doi: 10.1016/s0166-0934(00)00225-1.

Abstract

HIV RNA was quantified in blood plasma from 209 patients and in control specimen comparing the NucliSens HIV-1 QT test (Organon Teknika), which is based on the nucleic acid sequence amplification procedure, and the Quantiplex 3.0 test (Bayer), which uses hybridization signal enhancement by branched DNA (bDNA) probes. A highly significant correlation (P=0.01) was found between the two methods with 88% of the samples showing similar results. In cases of discrepant findings, higher virus load was observed with either test (14xNASBA>bDNA; 12xbNDA>NASBA). Differences could neither be related to clinical features nor to divergent virus subtypes. Standard preparations containing 35000 and 222000 copies were quantified with intra-assay coefficients of variation of <20% using both methods. A preparation of 192 copies was measured with lower precision by both tests, yet was detected more reliably by the bDNA method.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Blotting, Western
  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
  • HIV-1 / genetics*
  • Humans
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction
  • RNA, Viral / analysis
  • RNA, Viral / blood*
  • Reagent Kits, Diagnostic*
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Viral Load / methods*

Substances

  • RNA, Viral
  • Reagent Kits, Diagnostic