Purpose: The role of pressure flow studies in the routine evaluation of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia remains a controversial issue in urological practice. There are little data on age matched asymptomatic control groups. We evaluated pressure flow findings in such a group.
Materials and methods: A total of 24 male patients 47 to 80 years old (mean age 62.5) attending a general surgical clinic were recruited for study after ethical committee approval. The volunteers had never sought medical attention for urinary symptoms and did not perceive themselves as having a urological problem. Volunteers were assessed by International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) and Madsen symptom score, clinical examination, free uroflowmetry, post-void residual ultrasound, repeat pressure flow studies and transrectal ultrasonography. Pressure flow tracings were manually analyzed for standard urodynamic values and the degree of bladder outflow obstruction according to recognized International Continence Society, Abrams-Griffith nomogram, linear passive urethral resistance relation and urethral resistance factor classifications.
Results: Median I-PSS was 2.0 (interquartile range 1.2 to 5.7). For I-PSS quality of life the median was 1.0 (interquartile range 0.75 to 2.0). On pressure flow studies 3 patients (13%) had unequivocal obstruction, 7 (29%) were in the equivocal area and 14 (58%) had no obstruction, while 15 (63%) had unstable contractions on medium fill cystometry.
Conclusions: The data show that a surprising number of apparently normal men are obstructed by commonly used criteria. This finding confirms asymptomatic obstruction, suggesting that obstruction may be less important in the development of symptoms than previously thought. Also, until the natural history of obstruction is more clearly defined surgery in obstructed asymptomatic patients is probably unwise.