Background: The value of ultrasound B-scan for routine follow-up of melanoma patients still is not generally accepted. Therefore, the authors compared the efficacy of physical examination (PE) with ultrasound B-scan (UBS) for detection of regional tumor recurrence in melanoma patients. The aim of the current study was to evaluate whether early detection of metastases improves relapse-free and overall survival.
Methods: For a period of 4 years, 829 consecutive melanoma patients were followed prospectively. Physical examination of 3011 patients and concomitant UBS of in-transit routes and regional lymph node basins were performed. Suspicious lesions were diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration cytology and pathology.
Results: During the study period, 242 (90.6%) of 267 patients with melanoma recurrences were first recognized by PE or UBS within the routine follow-up program. The sensitivities of both methods differed significantly (P = 0.001). Metastases were detected by PE in only 61 of 242 recurrences (25.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.9-31.2%), whereas UBS revealed 240 recurrences (99.2%, 95% CI: 97.3-99.6%). The specificity was 98.4% (95% CI: 97.8-98.8%) and 98.3% (95% CI: 97.7-98.7%), respectively. Survival of 103 patients who presented with a first nodal melanoma recurrence was followed and analyzed by multiple Cox regression. Overall survival was affected by the diameter of the largest metastasis (P = 0.001) and the number of metastatic lesions (P = 0.012).
Conclusion: The study found that ultrasound B-scan was highly effective in the early detection of regional melanoma metastases compared with physical examination. Earlier detection of such metastases seemed to result in improved overall survival.
Copyright 2001 American Cancer Society.