Introduction: We have carried out a retrospective study of 135 patients followed at Curie Institute for choroidal naevus between March 1983 and June 1997.
Patients and methods: 54 patients presented naevi considered as benign and 81 patients presented suspicious choroidal naevi (with at least one of the following findings: visual symptoms; serious detachment of the retina; orange pigment; thickness greater than 2mm or a diameter greater than 7mm). These suspicious naevi were followed more carefully. The median follow-up was 49 months. The median diameter of the lesions was 6mm and the median thickness was 1.5mm. We studied the age of the patients, clinical symptoms, the presence or absence of orange pigment, drusen and serious detachment, and the angiographic and echographic findings.
Results: 3 patients died of unrelated cause; 7 patients were lost to follow-up; 30 patients presented documented growth; 4 of them belonged to the group considered as benign and 26 to the group considered as suspicious, with a significant difference between the groups. The lesions that grew were treated by proton beam or I125 patches. The risk factors for growth that were statistically significant were the presence of visual symptoms, pin points, orange pigment, serous detachment and thickness greater than 2mm. With drusen, the risk for growth was significantly less.
Discussion: These results are very similar to those published in the literature concerning risk factors for growth of choroidal nevi. The absence of metastatic spread in patients whose nevi have grown show that it is possible to monitor choroidal naevi if there is a doubt as to the malignant or benign nature of the lesion.
Conclusion: It is important to determine if a choroidal naevus is suspicious or benign and to propose closer follow-up for suspicious lesions.