Community-based ivermectin therapy for onchocerciasis: comparison of three methods of dose assessment

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001 Sep;65(3):184-8. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2001.65.184.

Abstract

A new method of assessment based on mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) is described for dosage adjustment for community-based ivermectin distribution. We studied 878 subjects eligible for ivermectin dosing in Awhum, Nigeria. In a previous preliminary study of 40 persons, MUAC (in cm) correlated with weight (kg) in the first 20 male (r = 0.97, r2 = 0.95, P < 0.0001) and the first 20 female subjects (r = 0.94, r2 = 0.88, P < 0.0001). We therefore studied the use of height, physical appearance, and MUAC for calculating the dose of ivermectin. The MUAC-based schedule underdosed only 4.1% of the population. The methods based on height underdosed 3.3% and 21.1%, and assignment based on physical appearance underdosed 10.2% of the population studied. This MUAC-based method (13-15 cm, 0.5 tablet; 16-20 cm, 1.0 tablet; 21-27 cm, 1.5 tablets; > or = 28 cm, 2.0 tablets) is more convenient and corresponds closely to dosing by weight. An adaptation of this method with reference to other prevalent tropical diseases and their respective drugs is therefore advocated.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Animals
  • Antinematodal Agents / administration & dosage
  • Antinematodal Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Arm / anatomy & histology
  • Body Height / physiology
  • Body Weight / physiology
  • Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Ivermectin / administration & dosage
  • Ivermectin / therapeutic use*
  • Male
  • Nigeria
  • Onchocerca / drug effects*
  • Onchocerciasis / drug therapy*

Substances

  • Antinematodal Agents
  • Ivermectin