Introduction/objectives: Contrast-enhanced MRA (ce-MRA) has been claimed by many authors as a replacement of conventional angiography evaluating peripheral arterial occlusive disease. However, reliable detection of relevant stenoses (>70%) has to be provided for planning vascular interventions. Only few data in the literature focuses on this crucial problem. The purpose of this study was to evaluate this topic using a two-step body-coil-based MRA protocol.
Methods and patients: Forty three patients presenting with 82 stenoses >/=50% and 61 stenoses >70% on conventional catheter angiogram received fast Gadolinium-DTPA-enhanced high resolution 3D MR angiography at 1.5 T covering the pelvic and peripheral vascular tree in two examination steps using the body-coil. The data were evaluated double-blinded by three readers distinguishing moderate (50-70%) from severe stenoses (>70%).
Results: Overall sensitivity/specificity/accuracy was 84/60/70% evaluating 143 segments. Specificity was rather poor in the iliac (58%) and crural (50%) region and moderate in the femoral and popliteal level (73%). The negative predictive value ranged between 78 and 91%. The grade of stenosis tend to be overestimated rather than underestimated in all levels with positive predictive values between 55 and 78%.
Discussions and conclusions: Body-coil-based contrast-enhanced MRA has limited potential in distinguishing moderate from severe stenoses in peripheral occlusive disease. Overestimations are more common than underestimations. Both occur mainly in small-sized crural arteries but also in larger iliac arteries where vessel course in partition direction may cause inadequacy between voxel size and lumen diameter in severe stenosis.