Background: Although angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition has been shown to slow progression of chronic allograft nephropathy in animal models, no studies have examined its efficacy in humans.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 63 patients with biopsy-proven chronic allograft nephropathy who had > or =6 months dialysis-free follow-up at our institution. A total of 32 patients treated for > or =6 consecutive months with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and/or angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) therapy (group 1) were compared with 31 patients not on these agents (group 2).
Results: Except for a higher incidence of hypertension (100 vs. 78%, P=0.005) in group 1, there were no significant differences in baseline clinical characteristics at time of biopsy. With a mean follow-up time of 27 months in both groups, 6 of 32 (19%) group 1 patients vs. 12 of 31 (39%) group 2 reached the primary endpoint of > or =50% increase in serum creatinine (P=0.10). Mean time to primary endpoint was 46.6 months in group 1 vs. 32.7 months in group 2 (P=0.07). Three of 32 (9%) of group 1 patients vs. 8 of 31 (26%) of group 2 returned to dialysis during this time (P=0.11). Significantly fewer patients in group 1 reached the combined secondary endpoint of allograft failure or death (9.4 vs. 35.5%, P=0.01); in addition, group 1 had a longer mean time to this endpoint (51.2 vs. 37.6 months, P=0.03). On multivariate analysis, the only predictor of progression to primary endpoint was a high baseline serum creatinine (P=0.02). No significant differences in hyperkalemia or anemia were found between the two groups.
Conclusions: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition/angiotensin-receptor blocker therapy is well tolerated in renal allograft recipients with chronic allograft nephropathy. It is associated with a trend of slowing renal insufficiency as well as a significant survival benefit in the combined endpoint of allograft failure or death.