To date the position of Leukotriene Receptor Antagonists (LTRAs) in asthma is not yet fully established. Recent asthma guidelines consider LTRAs as 'alternative' to low doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for treatment of patients with mild persistent asthma, while in Europe LTRAs are licensed as additional therapy to ICS. Our aim in this paper is to review comparative studies between ICS and antileukotrienes in mild to moderate asthma, looking at their efficacy on asthma outcomes and on patient expectations (compliance, quality of life, and safety). Some studies report a superior efficacy of ICS, while others, in particular in patients aged < 12 years, found no differences. When considering patients' expectations LTRAs seem to be superior, with higher compliance and quality of life. Even if no differences in adverse effects have been found between ICS and LTRAs, whose safety profiles are not different from placebo, some concerns exist on long term treatment with ICS, even at low doses, in children and postmenopausal women. For this reason, even if ICS are superior to LTRAs in controlling asthma outcomes and in improving pulmonary function, in children and elderly patients LTRAs can be considered an alternative to low-dose ICS.