Pirarubicin-based versus doxorubicin-based osteosarcoma chemotherapy

Ann Pharmacother. 2002 Jun;36(6):996-9. doi: 10.1345/aph.1A187.

Abstract

Objective: To conduct a retrospective evaluation of tetrahydropyranyladriamycin (PIR)-based combination chemotherapy for osteosarcomas in comparison with doxorubicin (DOX)-based regimens to determine differences in response and toxicities between DOX- and PIR-containing regimens.

Methods: Toxicities and response rates of the 2 anthracyclines given as combination chemotherapy were assessed in patients with osteosarcoma, with 19 patients receiving PIR-based and 11 receiving DOX-based regimens.

Results: The survival of osteosarcoma patients treated with PIR was significantly better than that with DOX (p = 0.023) based on 2-year follow-up. Adverse effects such as mucositis and diarrhea were also less pronounced in the PIR cohort.

Conclusions: PIR-based combination chemotherapy might be a useful and safe chemotherapeutic strategy for osteosarcomas compared with DOX regimens. Further assessment is necessary to confirm the safety and efficacy of this treatment.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Antineoplastic Agents / administration & dosage
  • Antineoplastic Agents / adverse effects
  • Antineoplastic Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / administration & dosage
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / adverse effects
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use*
  • Child
  • Doxorubicin / administration & dosage
  • Doxorubicin / adverse effects
  • Doxorubicin / analogs & derivatives*
  • Doxorubicin / therapeutic use*
  • Female
  • Gastrointestinal Diseases / chemically induced
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Osteosarcoma / drug therapy*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Survival Rate

Substances

  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • Doxorubicin
  • pirarubicin