For children with AML in CR1, the major consolidation therapies are BMT, ABMT and intensive chemotherapy. The relative effectiveness of these strategies is still debated. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of trials to determine the effectiveness of BMT and ABMT in CR1 in paediatric AML. Eligible studies enrolled patients <21 years from 1985 to 2000 with AML in CR1. Two groups of studies were identified: (1) Those comparing the outcome of patients with and without a histocompatible family donor; and (2) Randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing ABMT with non-myeloablative chemotherapy. The relative risk statistic was calculated for outcomes of interest in each trial. If there was no excessive heterogeneity between trials the results were pooled, and an overall relative risk and risk difference for treatment effect across trials were calculated. Results of the analysis showed that allocation to BMT reduced risk of relapse and improved disease-free and overall survival. For ABMT, heterogeneity of effect between RCTs prevented pooling of results. In conclusion, BMT from a histocompatible family donor improves patient outcome. Data are insufficient to determine whether this is true for all subgroups of AML, and whether ABMT is superior to non-myeloablative chemotherapy. An individual patient data meta-analysis is required to further evaluate the available data.