Background: Ischemia/reperfusion injury, and thus graft pancreatitis, remains a major problem in pancreas transplantation. Contradictory results about the role of nitric oxide (NO) in pancreatic ischemia/reperfusion have been reported; however, in none of the reports has a detailed comparison between inhibition of NO synthase and NO supplementation been carried out.
Methods: Vascular isolation of the pancreatic tail was performed in landrace pigs. After splenectomy catheters placed in the distal part of the splenic vessels allowed collection of the venous effluent and perfusion of the pancreatic tail. Three hours of complete warm ischemia was followed by 6 h of reperfusion. The effect of the NO donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and L-arginine was compared to a control group and NO synthase inhibition with L-NAME.
Results: Lipase in the venous effluent of the pancreas was significantly decreased in the SNP and the L-arginine groups. Vascular resistance was markedly elevated in the L-NAME group and reduced in the NO donor groups. Tissue pO2 after reperfusion was only significantly elevated in the SNP group. Granulocyte infiltration and also overall histological tissue injury were most severe in the control group followed by the L-NAME group, the SNP group, and the L-ARG group.
Conclusion: The data show that supplementation of nitric oxide is clearly protective in pancreatic ischemia/reperfusion. However, inhibition of NO synthesis does not lead to an equally clear aggravation of tissue injury.