Internal defibrillation: pain perception of low energy shocks

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2002 Jul;25(7):1090-3. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.01090.x.

Abstract

Recently, device-based low energy cardoversion shocks have been used as therapy for AF. However, discomfort from internal low energy electrical shocks is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to evaluate pain perception with low energy internal discharges. Eighteen patients with ICD devices for malignant ventricular arrhythmias were recruited to receive shocks of 0.4 and 2 J in the nonsedated state. Discharges were delivered in a blinded, random order and questionnaires were used to determine discomfort levels and tolerability. Patients perceived discharges at these energies as relatively uncomfortable, averaging a score of 7.3 on a discomfort scale of 0-10, and could not distinguish 0.4-J shocks from 2-J shocks. Second shocks were perceived as more uncomfortable than initial discharges, regardless of the order in which the shocks were delivered. Despite the perceived discomfort, 83% of patients stated that they would tolerate discharges of this magnitude once per month, and 44% would tolerate weekly discharges. Patients perceive low energy discharges as painful and cannot distinguish between shocks of 0.4 and 2 J. The results suggest that ICD systems developed to treat atrial tachyarrhythmias should minimize the number of shocks delivered to terminate an atrial tachyarrhythmia episode. The majority of the patients tolerated low energy shocks provided the discharges are infrequent (once per month).

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Chi-Square Distribution
  • Electric Countershock / adverse effects*
  • Electric Countershock / methods
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pain / etiology*
  • Pain Measurement
  • Pain Threshold
  • Prospective Studies
  • Statistics, Nonparametric
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Ventricular Dysfunction / physiopathology
  • Ventricular Dysfunction / therapy*