[Comparison of wire versus carbon localization of non-palpable breast lesions]

Rofo. 2002 Sep;174(9):1126-31. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-33933.
[Article in German]

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the accuracy of wire and carbon localization in stereotactically localized open breast biopsy.

Patients and methods: From June 1995 to December 1997, a total of 725 stereotactic wire or carbon dye localizations were performed in 698 female patients. Success of localization was evaluated either by a malignant histopathological diagnosis or by mammographic follow-up. A lesion was considered to be missed if it could be still seen on follow-up mammography.

Results: In 703 of 725 cases, the success of localization could be evaluated with 427 (61 %) lesions localized with a wire and 276 (39 %) with carbon. Seven (1 %) out of 703 lesions were missed at open biopsy. Three lesions of these had been localized with wire and three lesions with carbon. The miss rates were 0.9 % and 1.1 %, respectively (p = 1.0).

Conclusion: Both wire and carbon localization are reliable and accurate in the localization of non-palpable breast lesions. Concerning efficiency and costs, carbon dye seems to offer a promising compromise.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Biopsy / instrumentation*
  • Breast / pathology
  • Breast Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging*
  • Breast Neoplasms / pathology
  • Breast Neoplasms / surgery
  • Carbon*
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Female
  • Fibrocystic Breast Disease / diagnostic imaging
  • Fibrocystic Breast Disease / pathology
  • Fibrocystic Breast Disease / surgery
  • Humans
  • Mammography / instrumentation*
  • Middle Aged
  • Punctures / instrumentation*
  • Reproducibility of Results

Substances

  • Carbon