Intra-operative assessment of technical defects after carotid endarterectomy: a comparison between angiography and colour duplex scan

Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Feb;11(1):26-9. doi: 10.1016/s0967-2109(02)00112-6.

Abstract

We compared the intra-operative diagnostic value of CDS vs IA-DSA in identifying major and minor technical defects after CEA. Between August 1997 and December 1998, 138 consecutive patients undergoing 141 carotid endarterectomies were intra-operatively investigated with colour duplex scan and intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography. Thirty-six (25.5%) technical defects were identified. Four (11.1%) major defects were detected by both methods and they were immediately corrected. Fifteen (41.6%) minor defects were detected by both methods, thirteen (36.1%) minor defects were detected by colour duplex but ignored by angiography. Angiography detected four (11.1%) kinkings missed with the colour duplex. The overall sensitivity of both methods for major defect was 100%. The sensitivity of colour duplex for minor defects was 87% vs 59% for angiography. On the basis of our study, colour duplex could be considered the choice method for quality control after carotid endarterectomy.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Angiography, Digital Subtraction
  • Carotid Artery, Internal / diagnostic imaging
  • Carotid Artery, Internal / surgery*
  • Carotid Stenosis / surgery*
  • Clinical Competence
  • Endarterectomy, Carotid / standards*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Intraoperative Care / methods*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Quality Control
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex