Oral erosive/ulcerative lichen planus: preliminary findings in an open trial of sulodexide compared with cyclosporine (ciclosporin) therapy

Int J Dermatol. 2003 Apr;42(4):308-11. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-4362.2003.01770.x.

Abstract

Objective: To study the effect of the heparinoid sulodexide systemically, compared with topical cyclosporine (ciclosporin), on chronic oral erosive/ulcerative lichen planus.

Study design: An open nonrandomized trial was conducted in two groups of 10 Italian patients with lichen planus, with subjective assessment of pain and assessment of ulceration amelioration by nonblinded clinicians.

Results: Comparable pain relief and amelioration of erosions/ulcers were seen in patients on sulodexide and in those on ciclosporin, but with faster healing in those on sulodexide.

Conclusions: Sulodexide appears to be as effective, and perhaps more effective, than topical ciclosporin in the therapy of oral lichen planus, and is less expensive, but full double-blind placebo-controlled studies are required.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Anticoagulants / economics
  • Anticoagulants / therapeutic use*
  • Cyclosporine / economics
  • Cyclosporine / therapeutic use*
  • Female
  • Glycosaminoglycans / economics
  • Glycosaminoglycans / therapeutic use*
  • Hepatitis C / complications
  • Humans
  • Immunosuppressive Agents / economics
  • Immunosuppressive Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Lichen Planus, Oral / complications
  • Lichen Planus, Oral / drug therapy*
  • Male
  • Oral Ulcer / complications
  • Oral Ulcer / drug therapy*
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Anticoagulants
  • Glycosaminoglycans
  • Immunosuppressive Agents
  • glucuronyl glucosamine glycan sulfate
  • Cyclosporine