Background: The need to reduce costs in Laboratory Medicine is often related to the possibility of reducing test requests without taking into account patients' outcomes. Therefore, the term "appropriateness" in Laboratory Medicine as referred to the specific steps (pre-analytical, analytical, post-analytical) and related to the clinical process could allow the improvement of clinical effectiveness and economic efficiency.
Methods: Our experience has shown an improvement in analytical appropriateness (reorganization and re-engineering by Laboratory automation) and pre-analytical appropriateness (critical revision of the panel for cardiac markers) by evaluating the workload and errors rate in the pre-analytical phase.
Results: We obtained an economic saving (119,580 euro/year) in cardiac markers request (analytical appropriateness: 60%, pre-analytical appropriateness: 40%) and also an improvement in clinical appropriateness (diagnosis and therapy).
Conclusions: Our data confirm the need to improve communications between physicians and Laboratory Medicine as regards the pre-analytical step and to implement educational programs for defining criteria and procedures. Appropriateness in analytical and post-analytical steps contribute to achieve economic saving (Core lab, POCT) and improvement of the turn-around time (TAT).