Etoposide (E) + epirubicin (E) + cisplatin (P) combination chemotherapy (EEP) in advanced gastric cancer: negative impact on clinical outcome. Spanish Cooperative Group for GI Tumor Therapy (T.T.D.)

Ann Oncol. 1992 Dec;3(10):861-3. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a058113.

Abstract

One hundred nineteen patients with advanced gastric cancer were included in a study comparing EEP vs. FEM chemotherapy. The response rate was higher (30%) in patients on EEP than in those treated with FEM (p = 0.05). Severe leukopenia, anemia, alopecia and infection were significantly more frequent on EEP. In addition, because of its intrinsic toxicity, EEP chemotherapy has a negative impact on the performance status of patients treated with this regimen, more than half of whom presented at least one episode of severe symptomatic toxicity while on EEP chemotherapy. The median time to progression and median survival for EEP-FEM were 2.08-3.4 and 4.2-7.9 months, respectively. Our data do not support the use of EEP chemotherapy in patients with AGC.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Controlled Clinical Trial

MeSH terms

  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / adverse effects
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use*
  • Cisplatin / administration & dosage
  • Cisplatin / adverse effects
  • Cisplatin / therapeutic use
  • Epirubicin / administration & dosage
  • Epirubicin / adverse effects
  • Epirubicin / therapeutic use
  • Etoposide / administration & dosage
  • Etoposide / adverse effects
  • Etoposide / therapeutic use
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Stomach Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Epirubicin
  • Etoposide
  • Cisplatin

Supplementary concepts

  • EEP protocol