Encouraging structured personalised diabetes care in general practice. A 6-year follow-up study of process and patient outcomes in newly diagnosed patients

Scand J Prim Health Care. 2003 Jun;21(2):89-95. doi: 10.1080/802813430310001680.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the quality of diabetes care achieved on the process and outcomes of care in the context of a multifaceted intervention directed at general practitioners (GPs) encouraging regular follow-up and individualised goal-setting.

Design: A 6-year follow-up study.

Setting: A total of 243 Danish GPs and a population-based sample of 729 newly diagnosed, predominantly type 2 diabetic patients participated.

Main outcome measures: Questionnaires and laboratory assessments were used to determine the proportion of patients reviewed regularly, and their pharmacological treatment and risk factors.

Results: During the study, the proportion of patients who had an annual clinical examination decreased from 100% to 77%. The proportion given oral anti-diabetic agents or insulin increased from 43% to 71%. Median glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) dropped in the 2nd year to 7.7% (normal range 5.4-7.4%), after which it increased gradually, but remained on average at 1.3% above the upper limit of the normal range. Median blood pressure (systolic/diastolic), total cholesterols and fasting triglycerides were maintained at 145-150/81-85 mmHg, 6.0-6.2 mmol/l and 1.66-1.96 mmol/l, respectively. Initial weight loss was partly regained over 6 years.

Conclusion: Among centrally supported GPs, most patients were regularly reviewed and obtained acceptable levels of risk factors for at least 6 years, although glycaemic control progressively deteriorated after an initial drop to near-normal average level.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Denmark
  • Diabetes Mellitus / therapy*
  • Family Practice / organization & administration*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Health Services Research
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care*
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians'*
  • Program Evaluation
  • Risk Factors
  • Self Care*