Background: An empty and adequate clean colon is a prerequisite of diagnostic or therapeutic colonoscopy. Our aim is to assess the efficacy and tolerance of bowel preparation for colonoscopy with Fortrans (polyethylene glycols) versus oral bisacodyl.
Methods: One hundred and four consecutive patients scheduled for colonoscopy were prospectively enrolled and allocated to Fortrans group or bisacodyl group by block randomization.
Results: Ninety-four patients were included for final analysis. Forty-five patients underwent preparation with Fortrans. The efficacy and tolerance of colon preparation were similar with both methods (p = 0.102, p = 0.202). The latency before the first bowel movement and total preparation time were shorter with Fortrans than with bisacodyl (p = 0.0001 and 0.001, respectively). Statistically significant differences were noted in changes of body weight, serum levels of sodium and calcium in patients taking bisacodyl (p = 0.049, 0.015, and 0.038, respectively). The taste of Fortrans was rated significantly better than that of bisacodyl (p = 0.002). Patients experienced more abdominal discomfort completing preparation with bisacodyl (p = 0.002).
Conclusions: Fortrans and bisacodyl are equally effective and well tolerated in preparation for colonoscopy. However, Fortrans preparation takes less time and provides a better taste with less abdominal discomfort and less change in body weight as well as serum levels of sodium and calcium than bisacodyl preparation.