5-Hydroxytryptamine receptor agonists for the abortive treatment of vascular headaches block mast cell, endothelial and platelet activation within the rat dura mater after trigeminal stimulation

Brain Res. 1992 Jun 26;583(1-2):137-49. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(10)80017-4.

Abstract

Antidromic stimulation of small caliber trigeminal axons causes neurogenic inflammation in the dura mater and tongue as evidenced by marked increases in mast cell activation, protein extravasation, as well as in the numbers of endothelial cytoplasmic vesicles, endothelial microvilli and platelet aggregates within ipsilateral post-capillary venules. In this report, we examined the effects of pretreatment with serotonin1 receptor agonists, dihydroergotamine (50 micrograms/kg, i.v.) and sumatriptan (100 micrograms/kg, i.v.) on the light and electron microscopic changes which develop after trigeminal ganglion stimulation. Both dihydroergotamine and sumatriptan are useful in the acute treatment of vascular headaches and bind with high affinity to 5-HT1D receptors. Both drugs decreased significantly the number of dural vessels showing endothelial or platelet changes and the numbers of activated mast cells, but did not affect the neurogenic response in the tongue. The drugs also blocked the accumulation of horseradish peroxidase reaction product within the endothelium and perivascular space on the stimulated side. The receptor is not present on trigeminovascular fibers innervating extracranial cephalic tissues. Drug mechanism probably involves inhibition of a proximal step in the pathophysiological cascade (e.g., via activation of a prejunctional receptor) because (a) receptors for sumatriptan have not been identified on mast cells whereas the inflammatory response was attenuated in mast cells as well as within platelets and the endothelium and (b) previous work indicates that sumatriptan and dihydroergotamine block neurotransmitter release. Hence, constriction of vascular smooth muscle mediated by postjunctional 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors is unlikely to explain the anti-inflammatory actions of dihydroergotamine or sumatriptan reported here.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Axons / drug effects
  • Axons / physiology*
  • Axons / ultrastructure
  • Dihydroergotamine / pharmacology*
  • Dihydroergotamine / therapeutic use
  • Dura Mater / blood supply
  • Dura Mater / drug effects
  • Dura Mater / physiology*
  • Electric Stimulation
  • Endothelium, Vascular / drug effects
  • Endothelium, Vascular / physiology*
  • Endothelium, Vascular / ultrastructure
  • Indoles / pharmacology*
  • Indoles / therapeutic use
  • Male
  • Mast Cells / drug effects
  • Mast Cells / physiology*
  • Mast Cells / ultrastructure
  • Muscle, Smooth, Vascular / drug effects
  • Muscle, Smooth, Vascular / physiology
  • Muscle, Smooth, Vascular / ultrastructure
  • Platelet Activation / drug effects*
  • Rats
  • Rats, Inbred Strains
  • Receptors, Serotonin / drug effects
  • Receptors, Serotonin / physiology*
  • Sulfonamides / pharmacology*
  • Sulfonamides / therapeutic use
  • Sumatriptan
  • Trigeminal Ganglion / physiology*
  • Vascular Headaches / drug therapy*
  • Venules / drug effects
  • Venules / physiology*
  • Venules / ultrastructure

Substances

  • Indoles
  • Receptors, Serotonin
  • Sulfonamides
  • Dihydroergotamine
  • Sumatriptan