Acute reflux pancreatitis in rats: a comparison between two experimental models

Gastroenterol Jpn. 1992 Oct;27(5):657-61. doi: 10.1007/BF02774982.

Abstract

This study was undertaken in order to compare the reliability of two acute reflux pancreatitis models in rats, one performed by positioning a silicon tube in the duodenum and the other by creating a gastro-jejunal anastomosis. In two groups (A = 10 and B = 10 rats) a silicon tube was positioned in the duodenum; in the remaining two groups (C = 12 and D = 6 rats) a latero-lateral antecolic anisoperistaltic gastro-jejunal anastomosis was performed 30 days before surgery. A closed duodenal loop was created for 12 hours in groups A and C but not in B and D. Rats in both groups A and C developed acute pancreatic inflammation of a mild degree. Sham operated rats with silicon tube placement had higher histological damage scores than those with gastro-jejunal anastomosis. The difference found between the two groups of rats which underwent gastro-jejunal anastomosis was more marked than that between the two groups which had silicon tube placement. It was concluded that the creation of a gastro-jejunal anastomosis is probably the safer procedure to allow gastro-intestinal flow in acute reflux pancreatitis in rats.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Amylases / blood
  • Anastomosis, Surgical
  • Animals
  • Disease Models, Animal*
  • Duodenum
  • Edema / pathology
  • Fat Necrosis / pathology
  • Hemorrhage / pathology
  • Intestinal Secretions
  • Intubation / instrumentation
  • Jejunum / surgery
  • Male
  • Necrosis
  • Pancreatitis / enzymology
  • Pancreatitis / etiology*
  • Pancreatitis / pathology
  • Rats
  • Rats, Sprague-Dawley
  • Silicones
  • Stomach / surgery

Substances

  • Silicones
  • Amylases