Extraperitoneal endoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection vs. laparoscopic lymph node dissection in the staging of prostatic and bladder carcinoma

J Laparoendosc Surg. 1992 Oct;2(5):219-22. doi: 10.1089/lps.1992.2.219.

Abstract

Eighteen patients undergoing laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy were compared with eighteen patients undergoing lymph node dissection performed via a totally extraperitoneal approach called extraperitoneal endoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection. Operative time, nodal yield, and hospital stays were essentially the same in both groups. However, the laparoscopic approach had a greater incidence of morbidity, leading the authors to adopt a totally extra-peritoneal endoscopic approach to pelvic lymph node dissection. Advantages of using an extraperitoneal approach are presented.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Endoscopy
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy*
  • Lymph Node Excision / methods*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Staging*
  • Pelvis
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Urinary Bladder Neoplasms / pathology*