Background: In Lazio, only about 5% of uremic patients are on peritoneal dialysis (PD). The present study focuses on the parameters of PD selection, the treatment schedules, and the clinical outcomes of PD patients in the nine public facilities offering a PD program. A cohort of 249 first-time PD patients, from July 1, 1994 to December 31, 2000, was retrospectively considered.
Methods: For the enrollment of the patients, the Regional Dialysis Registry databank was consulted. On December 31, 2000, a systematic review of patient charts was performed to extract the reasons for the PD choice, details of PD schedule, peritonitis episodes, reasons for drop-out, and patient survival rates. In regard to technique success-defined as the probability of having a patient alive on PD-change of modality and death were considered as final events. In regard to patient survival, only death, even in the first 2 months after a shift to hemodialysis, was considered the end point.
Result: The main PD selection reasons were patient and/or nephrologist preference in 90% of cases. One-hundred eighty-nine patients (76%) had been started on CAPD. During the follow-up, 38.2% dialysis schedules had been modified at least once. At the end of follow-up, 41.2% patients were on APD. The peritonitis rate was one episode per 30 patient-months (1 per 27 patient-months in CAPD; 1 per 37 patient-months in APD; p = 0.08). The technique success rate was 66.3% after 2 years and 49.8% after 3 years. The patient survival rate was 81.1% after 2 years and 68.7% after 3 years.
Conclusions: Patients chose PD as a first dialysis treatment mainly because of reasons unrelated to their clinical status. The technique's success, patient mortality rates, and the peritonitis rate do not explain the low PD diffusion in the region. The peritonitis rate meets the target criteria for excellence recommended by the Italian Society of Nephrology. The observed outcomes may have been favored by the selection of motivated patients and by the increased use of APD.