Differences in perceptions by stage of fluid adherence

J Ren Nutr. 2003 Oct;13(4):275-81. doi: 10.1016/s1051-2276(03)00115-8.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine in a group of hemodialysis patients whether perceptions of barriers to and benefits of adherence to fluid limitations, perceived seriousness of and susceptibility to the consequences of nonadherence, self-efficacy, and thirst differed by stage of fluid adherence.

Design: Cross-sectional descriptive design.

Setting: There were 147 participants from rural, suburban, and urban outpatient hemodialysis units.

Results: Significant differences were found in perceived benefits, barriers, seriousness, susceptibility, and thirst intensity by stage of fluid adherence. There were no significant differences in self-efficacy by stage of fluid adherence.

Conclusion: Stage of fluid adherence may be important to consider when designing interventions to reduce fluid intake.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Chi-Square Distribution
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Drinking*
  • Female
  • Health Behavior*
  • Humans
  • Interviews as Topic
  • Kidney Failure, Chronic / psychology
  • Kidney Failure, Chronic / therapy*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Compliance / psychology*
  • Perception*
  • Renal Dialysis / psychology*
  • Self Efficacy
  • Thirst
  • Weight Gain