Double-blind comparison of the continued use of antipsychotic treatment versus its discontinuation in remitted manic patients

Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Jan;161(1):169-71. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.1.169.

Abstract

Objective: The goal of this study was to determine the benefits of the continued use of a typical antipsychotic agent following remission from an acute manic episode.

Method: Immediately following remission of a manic episode treated with the combination of a typical antipsychotic (perphenazine) and a mood stabilizer (lithium, carbamazepine, or valproate), 37 patients were randomly assigned to 6 months of double-blind treatment in which in addition to the mood stabilizer they received either continued perphenazine treatment or placebo.

Results: Patients randomly assigned to continue perphenazine treatment, relative to those who discontinued it, were more likely to have a shorter time to depressive relapse, discontinue the study, and have increased rates of dysphoria, depressive symptoms, and extrapyramidal symptoms.

Conclusions: There were no short-term benefits with the continued use of a typical antipsychotic after achieving remission from an episode of acute mania. In fact, its continued use was associated with detrimental effects.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Antipsychotic Agents / administration & dosage
  • Antipsychotic Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Bipolar Disorder / diagnosis
  • Bipolar Disorder / drug therapy*
  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Drug Administration Schedule
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Perphenazine / administration & dosage
  • Perphenazine / therapeutic use*
  • Remission Induction
  • Severity of Illness Index

Substances

  • Antipsychotic Agents
  • Perphenazine