Validity and reliability of the SF-36 questionnaire in patients on the waiting list for a kidney transplant and transplant patients

Am J Nephrol. 2004 May-Jun;24(3):346-51. doi: 10.1159/000079053. Epub 2004 Jun 11.

Abstract

Background/aims: The aim of this study is to explore the validity and reliability of the health-related quality of life SF-36 questionnaire in patients undergoing renal replacement therapy.

Methods: A multicenter descriptive transversal study was carried out in Galicia, Spain, with patients undergoing renal replacement therapy. The tool used to measure the health-related quality of life was the authorized Spanish version of the 'SF-36' generic health questionnaire. The internal consistency of this survey was determined by means of interscale correlations and Cronbach's alpha statistic. Validity was examined with a principal component exploratory factor analysis with Varimax rotation.

Results: A total of 213 patients waiting for a kidney transplant and 72 recipients with a functioning renal transplant were studied. All the interscale correlations were positive and significant. The overall statistical value for Cronbach's alpha was equal to 0.91 (95% CI: 0.91-0.94) and in all domains this value ranged from 0.7 to 0.92. The factor analysis identified 8 factors that explain 66.6% of the variance, 5 of which consisted of the same structure as 5 factors (domains) of the theoretical model.

Conclusion: The SF-36 questionnaire is also a reliable and valid tool when used to measure the quality of life of patients undergoing renal replacement therapy.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Kidney Transplantation*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Surveys and Questionnaires*
  • Waiting Lists*