Aim of the study was to ascertain if a common cultural feeling of young people toward health, disease, physician's role and doctor-patient relationship, is present, and if under- and post-graduate students concepts and opinions modify during their stay in a School of Medicine. The study (1999-2001) was performed by anonymous questionnaires with 75 students (m = 28; f = 47) of the State School of Medicine, tested at the 3rd year, and with 73 students (m = 29; f = 44) tested at the 5th year of course; moreover with 71 (m = 30, f = 41) postgraduate residents at the 3rd year of specialty (Internal Medicine, Cardiology and Surgery). A group of 76 (m = 33; f = 43) students of the last year of a high school was also tested as reference group.
Results: Interference of medical under- and post-graduate school curricula on thoughts of youngsters toward health, disease, physician's role and doctor-patient relationship appears quite limited. Dissimilar way of thinking of medical vs. non-medical students was confined to some aspects concerning patient's possibility of healing, physician's role, behavior and function in chronic diseases. In the whole, our results suggest a trend, growing with the age of students, toward a more authoritarian and less "participative" approach with the patient: less confident relationship and more conflictual and antagonistic behaviors are widely considered and accepted. A general perspective with the construct of an authoritarian concept of health is superimposed as a net of rules and conditions on feelings' background of youngsters: postgraduate students regard themselves (and are perceived by younger students) as the guardians of an "healthy" system founded on scientific, economical and sociological grounds, as a work pointing to effectiveness, more than as a science with the target of efficacy.
Conclusion: Impact of curricular studies of Medicine on youngsters is complex, but seems to modify only some and limited aspects of previously acquired thoughts and feelings on health and disease.