Criticality accident dosimetry systems: an international intercomparison at the SILENE reactor in 2002

Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2004;110(1-4):429-36. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nch233.

Abstract

In criticality accident dosimetry and more generally for high dose measurements, special techniques are used to measure separately the gamma ray and neutron components of the dose. To improve these techniques and to check their dosimetry systems (physical and/or biological), a total of 60 laboratories from 29 countries (America, Europe, Asia) participated in an international intercomparaison, which took place in France from 9 to 21 June 2002, at the SILENE reactor in Valduc and at a pure gamma source in Fontenay-aux-Roses. This intercomparison was jointly organised by the IRSN and the CEA with the help of the NEA/OCDE and was partly supported by the European Communities. This paper describes the aim of this intercomparison, the techniques used by the participants and the two radiation sources and their characteristics. The experimental arrangements of the dosemeters for the irradiations in free air or on phantoms are given. Then the dosimetric quantities measured and reported by the participants are summarised, analysed and compared with the reference values. The present paper concerns only the physical dosimetry and essentially experiments performed on the SILENE facility. The results obtained with the biological dosimetry are published in two other papers of this issue.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Body Burden
  • France
  • Humans
  • International Cooperation
  • Nuclear Reactors
  • Observer Variation
  • Quality Assurance, Health Care / methods
  • Radiation Dosage
  • Radiation Protection / methods*
  • Radiation Protection / standards*
  • Radioactive Hazard Release*
  • Radiometry / methods*
  • Radiometry / standards*
  • Reference Standards
  • Relative Biological Effectiveness
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Risk Assessment / methods*
  • Risk Assessment / standards*
  • Risk Factors
  • Safety Management / methods
  • Sensitivity and Specificity