[Secondary stability of cemented and non-cemented acetabular implants ex-vivo under dynamic load]

Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2004 Oct 22;42(20):1228-31.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: To measure the bone-prosthetic implant interface micromovement during the application of physiological load by using a material testing system (MTS).

Methods: The cadaveric hip specimens were used to simulate a single leg stance and the joint in the neutral position. Micromovement was recorded via a 3-dimensional transducer in the acetabula of postmortem specimens, which had been preserved in formalin. The study data of the cemented and uncemented prosthsis refereed to the lone-term clinical process and the radiological status and experimental results.

Results: Cemented cups showed higher transverse relative motion up to 90 microm, whereas the maximum transverse movement of the non-cemented cup was 60 microm. Orthogonal motion perpendicular to the implant surface showed compression for all cups at all sites.

Conclusion: The results indicate that there are large differences in survival time between 2 groups. That could not be compared statistically in secondary stability. Nevertheless, according to the results, the amount of micromotion of press-fit cup is relatively less than that of cemented polyethylene cup, which is instrumental in bone ingrowth and secondary stability.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / methods*
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Bioprosthesis*
  • Bone Cements*
  • Female
  • Hip Prosthesis*
  • Humans
  • Prosthesis Failure
  • Weight-Bearing

Substances

  • Bone Cements