Efficacy of antimalarial chemoprophylaxis among French residents travelling to Africa

Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2005 Feb;99(2):91-100. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2004.01.006.

Abstract

Controversy exists about which antimalarial chemoprophylaxis regimen should be used among travellers to Africa: the WHO and other experts recommend the use of mefloquine throughout sub-Saharan Africa, whereas French experts still support the combination of chloroquine and proguanil in most of West Africa (the so-called zone 2 countries). In this case-control study based at a travel clinic, we examined the compliance with antimalarial chemoprophylaxis and its efficacy among travellers to tropical areas. Cases were patients with Plasmodium falciparum malaria (n = 131). Controls were patients who had a negative malaria film (n = 158). Of all controls, only 36 (22.8%) were adequately protected (i.e. compliant with an adapted regimen of chemoprophylaxis). In zone 2 countries, the efficacy of the combined chloroquine and proguanil was 58% (95% CI 22-78%) for all users, but increased to 100% (95% CI 89-100%) for compliant users. In zone 3 countries, the efficacy of mefloquine was 90% (95% CI 51-98%) and 100% (95% CI 58-100%) for all users and compliant users, respectively.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Africa South of the Sahara
  • Africa, Western
  • Antimalarials / therapeutic use*
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Chloroquine / blood
  • Chloroquine / therapeutic use
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Female
  • France / ethnology
  • Humans
  • Malaria, Falciparum / prevention & control*
  • Male
  • Mefloquine / blood
  • Mefloquine / therapeutic use
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Compliance*
  • Proguanil / blood
  • Proguanil / therapeutic use
  • Travel*
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Antimalarials
  • Chloroquine
  • Proguanil
  • Mefloquine