Computerized general practice databases provide quick and cost-effective information on the prevalence of angina pectoris

Ital Heart J. 2005 Jan;6(1):49-51.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence of angina pectoris (AP) using self-reported information and primary care databases.

Methods: A comparison between the prevalence of AP in 730,586 subjects from the Health Search Database (HSD) and 119,799 individuals from a Health Interview Survey (HIS) was performed. The age-specific prevalence was calculated by dividing the detected cases by the total number of individuals in each age group. The age-standardized prevalence was estimated by direct standardization performed using the Italian standard population.

Results: The HSD reported a higher crude prevalence of AP than the HIS, both in males (1374/100,000 vs 1006/100,000) and females (1449/100,000 vs 1007/100,000). In the HSD the age-specific prevalence was lower for patients aged <65 years, whilst higher estimates were reported for older patients. Age standardization slightly reduced the prevalence in both samples, although the HSD always reported higher estimates.

Conclusions: Prescription data from general practice databases may be a valid, simple, and cost-effective method to evaluate and serially monitor the prevalence of AP.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Age Distribution
  • Aged
  • Angina Pectoris / epidemiology*
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Databases, Factual / economics
  • Databases, Factual / standards
  • Databases, Factual / statistics & numerical data*
  • Electronic Data Processing / economics*
  • Family Practice / economics
  • Family Practice / statistics & numerical data*
  • Female
  • Health Surveys
  • Humans
  • Italy / epidemiology
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prevalence
  • Sex Distribution