[COX-2 inhibitors--one step forward and two steps back]

Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2005 Apr 7;125(7):875-8.
[Article in Norwegian]

Abstract

Background: Selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors are widely used. They have no advantages in terms of efficacy, and it is not documented that they cause fewer adverse effects than conventional NSAIDs.

Material and methods: The adverse effects of rofecoxib, celecoxib and other NSAIDs are reviewed. Relevant literature was identified on Medline and in the reference lists in key articles.

Results: Rofecoxib and the novel COX-2 inhibitors etoricoxib and valdecoxib have a higher degree of COX-2 selectivity than traditional NSAIDs. Celecoxib is less COX-2 selective and appears to be similar to diclofenac. Rofecoxib induces thromboembolic adverse effects more frequently than conventional NSAIDs.

Interpretation: The cardiovascular problems conferred by rofecoxib are probably a class effect and thus inducible by other selective COX-2 inhibitors. Pending comprehensive safety data, caution is warranted regarding the use of these drugs.

Publication types

  • English Abstract
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal / adverse effects*
  • Cardiovascular Diseases / chemically induced
  • Celecoxib
  • Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors / adverse effects*
  • Gastrointestinal Diseases / chemically induced
  • Humans
  • Lactones / adverse effects*
  • Pyrazoles / adverse effects*
  • Risk Factors
  • Sulfonamides / adverse effects*
  • Sulfones / adverse effects*

Substances

  • Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
  • Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors
  • Lactones
  • Pyrazoles
  • Sulfonamides
  • Sulfones
  • rofecoxib
  • Celecoxib