Management of suspected venous thromboembolism: the impact of a multifaceted intervention

Int J Qual Health Care. 2005 Oct;17(5):433-8. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzi050. Epub 2005 May 4.

Abstract

Objective: To achieve a common strategy in the event of a suspected venous thromboembolism.

Design: A multifaceted intervention, combining an audit strategy and implementation of local guidelines: phase 1, the first step, consisted of a 6-month audit to identify dysfunction; during phase 2, intervention, local guidelines were formulated by a working group and then implemented; phase 3 consisted of a re-audit over a 6-month period following the intervention.

Setting: A tertiary hospital, France.

Participants: 419 patients with suspected venous thromboembolism in phase 1; 287 patients with suspected pulmonary embolism in phase 3.

Results: First phase: a dysfunction was observed in three of five criteria under study: (i) the diagnostic procedure lasted more than 48 hours in 114 patients (27.2%); (ii) no anticoagulant therapy at the time of suspicion in 116 patients (27.7%); (iii) an inconclusive lung scan without further testing in the event of a suspected pulmonary embolism in 40 patients (14%); the intervention phase was thus restricted to the management of suspected pulmonary embolism; similar results were found during the phase 3 re-audit.

Conclusion: No improvement in the diagnostic work-up in the event of a suspected pulmonary embolism was observed following this multifaceted intervention.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Combined Modality Therapy
  • Female
  • Guideline Adherence
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Medical Audit
  • Middle Aged
  • Pulmonary Embolism / prevention & control*
  • Quality Assurance, Health Care*
  • Venous Thrombosis / complications
  • Venous Thrombosis / diagnosis*
  • Venous Thrombosis / therapy*