Abstract
We conducted a meta-analysis on 6 studies in 2,963 patients who had coronary artery disease and received a sirolimus-eluting stent or a bare metal stent for revascularization. Compared with bare metal stents, sirolimus-eluting stents did not appear to increase the risk for thrombosis up to 13.5 months after coronary intervention (risk ratio 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.22 to 1.12, p = 0.09).
Publication types
-
Comparative Study
-
Meta-Analysis
MeSH terms
-
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary / instrumentation*
-
Coated Materials, Biocompatible*
-
Coronary Disease
-
Coronary Stenosis / diagnostic imaging
-
Coronary Stenosis / therapy
-
Coronary Thrombosis / chemically induced*
-
Coronary Thrombosis / diagnostic imaging
-
Coronary Thrombosis / prevention & control
-
Follow-Up Studies
-
Humans
-
Immunosuppressive Agents / adverse effects*
-
Immunosuppressive Agents / therapeutic use
-
Incidence
-
Postoperative Complications
-
Radiography
-
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
-
Registries
-
Retrospective Studies
-
Risk Factors
-
Sirolimus / adverse effects*
-
Sirolimus / therapeutic use
-
Stents* / adverse effects
-
Time Factors
-
Treatment Outcome
Substances
-
Coated Materials, Biocompatible
-
Immunosuppressive Agents
-
Sirolimus